This still does not address what he "should" have known. It is hard to imagine an engaged chief executive of anything being able to successfully use the defense of "I did not know" when the matters at issue are so serious. Why didn't he know? What does it tell us about his management? What might it predict about how he would run the NYT Company?
Remind me again why it is that we cannot submit comments, for posting, on a story like this?
Remind me again why it is that we cannot submit comments, for posting, on a story like this?
No comments:
Post a Comment